Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

Widget HTML #1

[Download] "Service Employees International Union v." by Supreme Court of Idaho No. 14547 * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Service Employees International Union v.

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Service Employees International Union v.
  • Author : Supreme Court of Idaho No. 14547
  • Release Date : January 18, 1984
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 72 KB

Description

For the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1981, the budget for the Idaho Department of Health & Welfare (Department) was substantially reduced because of reduced state revenues resulting from an economic recession. Several bills approved by the legislature not only reduced the level of funding for the Department, but specifically eliminated funding for positions in regional management, central office staff, and eliminated some programs in their entirety, all of which resulted in a reorganization of the Department at a reduced level of operation. In addition, while House Concurrent Resolutions provided for 7% across-the-board salary increases for state employees, no money was appropriated for those increases, and agencies which granted increases to employees were required to eliminate positions in order to fund those increases. Employees in high job classifications where jobs were eliminated by the legislature were allowed to elect voluntary demotions in lieu of layoffs, a procedure whereby personnel with a higher number of retention points, points earned through merit and longevity, were allowed to accept demotion to a different position at a lower level and bump the employee in the lower position if he or she had fewer retention points. Appellant and several others, including labor unions representing Department employees, brought suit against the Department seeking injunctions and damages allegedly resulting from loss of merit pay increases caused by their accepting voluntary demotions in lieu of layoffs.[Footnote 1] The suit, which requested certification as a class action, contained three counts. The first count alleged a violation of statutory and constitutional provisions caused by the Department's freeze on merit pay increases. The second count alleged that employees were not consulted or given notice of the reduction in force decisions, allegedly contrary to Department policy and constitutional provisions. The third count alleged a violation of statutory and Department regulations and the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution, allegedly caused by the forced surrender of previously earned merit pay increases.


PDF Books "Service Employees International Union v." Online ePub Kindle